Wednesday, 28 September 2011 by Catherine Baksi The law society has concern about the Criminal Bar Association intention on the judiciary with his concerns about the controversial quality assurance scheme for advocates (QASA) expressed.
A law society spokesman said: "it is amazing that the bar should try to involve senior justice on this issue, since it would be wrong of course, if the justice is perceived to be, to a certain sector of the profession compared to other support."
He said there were "material weaknesses" in the QASA system, and the company has also reservations about it.
But he added: ' a big advantage [schema] will be that an advocate for the job as by their title is paid. We demand the Services Commission strongly legal, special pleading, a small, ranging from the bar to resist. "
The law society comments follow an e-Mail last week by CBA said Chair Max Hill QC, where he plans criminal lawyers of LSC, Crown Court payments to the level of competence achieved proponents to link higher payments to silk under QASA, and at the end.
Hill's e-Mail was followed by a meeting with the LSC, where he said that the proposals for the first time was mentioned.
He said QASA was never intended that affect to replace remuneration or silk, and that he planned to take these matters with the judiciary.
However the Chair of the Solicitors Association of higher court of advocates, Jo Cooper, who gave the same LSC take part, it said 'nothing new' in the proposals and that the LSC had informed lawyers 2009 about his plans for linking pay rates case level.
Cooper criticized also the CAB for aim include the justice in what he said was a legal question.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar